{"id":1647,"date":"2025-02-25T09:34:41","date_gmt":"2025-02-25T08:34:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/?p=1647"},"modified":"2025-02-25T09:34:41","modified_gmt":"2025-02-25T08:34:41","slug":"la-resistance-des-juges-face-aux-decrets-controverses-de-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/2025\/02\/25\/la-resistance-des-juges-face-aux-decrets-controverses-de-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"Judicial Resistance Against Trump's Controversial Executive Orders"},"content":{"rendered":"

Since his re-election on 20 January, 2025, Donald Trump has issued a series of controversial presidential orders<\/strong>, provoking strong reactions both in the United States and internationally. These decisions, often deemed unconstitutional, have faced growing opposition<\/a> from the judiciary power.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Between 23 January and 13 February, 2025, several federal judges canceled, suspended, or blocked a number of orders.<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong>One of the most significant cases involved the freezing of US foreign aid<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On 13 February, a federal judge from Washington<\/a> prevented the administration from implementing an executive order signed by Donald Trump on the day of his inauguration, which halted almost all funds allocated to development aid. In his ruling<\/a>, the judge stated that the presidential measure was \"based on dubious logic<\/strong> and causes considerable harm<\/strong><\/em>\u202f<\/strong>\" to beneficiaries, including NGOs, associations, and international organisations. He also ordered the executive branch to submit a report by 18 February detailing the steps taken to comply with this injunction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Judges have been equally vigilant regarding other aspects of the current White House policy. Presidential decisions concerning gender affirmation for transgender youth and deferred dismissals of civil servants have cited reasons ranging from \"unconstitutionality\"<\/strong>to the failure to comply<\/strong><\/a> with essential administrative law procedures.<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the background, the separation of powers<\/strong> is at stake: many judges point out that the American Constitution is not a \u2018political game\u2019 that a president can play at will.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The tug-of-war between Donald Trump and the judiciary illustrates the limits of executive power\u202f<\/strong>: the administration must take account of the constitutional legitimacy of its actions<\/strong>, or risk being continually hampered by emergency orders and temporary suspensions of its decrees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Depuis sa r\u00e9\u00e9lection le 20 janvier 2025, Donald Trump multiplie les d\u00e9crets pr\u00e9sidentiels controvers\u00e9s, suscitant de vives r\u00e9actions tant aux \u00c9tats-Unis qu\u2019\u00e0 l\u2019international. Ces d\u00e9cisions, souvent jug\u00e9es contraires \u00e0 la Constitution, ont rencontr\u00e9 une opposition croissante de la part du pouvoir judiciaire. Entre le 23\u202fjanvier et le 13\u202ff\u00e9vrier 2025, plusieurs juges f\u00e9d\u00e9raux ont ainsi annul\u00e9, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":237390538,"featured_media":1650,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[6325],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1647","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-non-classe"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/justiceexpeerience.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/Visuels-NL-11-e1740396962801.png?fit=716%2C480&ssl=1","jetpack_likes_enabled":false,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/peYfbV-qz","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/237390538"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1647"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1647\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1652,"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1647\/revisions\/1652"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1650"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/justiceexpeerience.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}